This report explains how wicking beds can help safeguard future food supply by saving water, improving soil quality, using nutrients more effectively, and embedding atmospheric carbon into soil. It also shows an unexpected benefit: linked wicking beds can act as drainage in flood conditions, helping crops survive long waterlogging. The main challenge has been cost and labour, so the trials focus on low-cost, large-scale installation methods suited to farmers and orchards.
Summary
Wicking beds have multiple benefits: they grow crops with limited water, improve soil quality, make better use of nutrients, and have the potential to absorb large volumes of atmospheric carbon. They also have significant potential to both reduce climate change and help growers adapt to the flood–drought cycle that is expected to increase with climate change. The major downside to date is that wicking beds are labour intensive to construct, which has largely limited adoption to environmentally sensitive growers operating on a small scale. The aim of this project was to develop a way of installing wicking beds cheaply and easily on a large scale by converting an existing orchard into multiple linked beds. Because pipes are one of the major costs, alternative low-cost flow paths were trialled using wood chips, bamboo, sticks covered with film, and bubble wrap. All systems were effective if slow fill rates were used, so final choice becomes a practical issue of cost, raw material availability, and ease of automation. Water-use efficiency has been well established, but long-term drought conditions ended with extensive flooding during these trials, preventing a clean productivity comparison. However, an unexpected and important benefit was observed: linked beds provided drainage that reduced long waterlogging of roots, helping plants survive conditions that would normally destroy crops.
Background
The world population continues to increase and is expected to rise toward nine billion within the next fifty years, placing greater pressure on food production resources. Historically, agriculture in developed countries has steadily improved efficiency by roughly 2% to 3% per year, which has more than compensated for population growth in the past. Climate change alters that equation. The expected increase in the flood-and-drought cycle will require farmers to adapt to more violent and less predictable weather. Australia provides a clear example: years of drought reduced food production; then drought-breaking rains produced some of the best crops in years, only for many to be destroyed by floods and heavy rains. This shows that flooding can be as devastating as drought. Food production is therefore the critical issue in climate change. Wicking beds can both reduce atmospheric carbon levels and help growers maintain food production through more violent flood-and-drought cycles, but to be effective they must be adopted at scale, which means making the technology cheaper and easier to implement. This document is a provisional report of trials aimed at low-cost, wide-scale application.
Technology Basics
Wicking bed technology was developed over ten years earlier to solve a specific problem: lack of rain during the critical period when seed heads fill. The basic concept is an underground water reservoir lined with plastic sheet that fills with water and wicks upward into the root zone above. A second generation placed waste organic material into the reservoir, so it slowly decomposed and plants fed on a nutrient-rich compost tea. A third generation added inoculants of fungi and worms, coupled with nitrogen to control decomposition, further improving soil quality and production. These steps made it clear that wicking beds are also an effective way of embedding large volumes of atmospheric carbon into soil. Plants already absorb many times man-made emissions, but most of that carbon is rapidly returned to the atmosphere; controlled decomposition inside wicking beds embeds carbon into soil, providing a practical pathway for reducing atmospheric carbon while building fertility. The technology is widely adopted by environmentally sensitive growers but mainly on a small scale. Widespread adoption requires solving two key problems: developing low-cost large-area application and achieving acceptance for carbon trading so growers can be paid for absorbing carbon. The report notes the scale this could reach: for example, China could theoretically offset its entire emissions if about 17 million hectares were converted, around one third of China’s irrigated farmland, and widespread adoption by developing countries could create large volumes of carbon credits traded into emitter nations.
Aims of the Research Project
The aim of the research is to find a method of applying wicking beds to large areas at an economic price and to establish a mechanism for carbon trading involving millions of small growers worldwide. Low cost plus carbon-trading revenue would make it economic for farmers currently using flood irrigation to upgrade. This matters because flood irrigation is one of the largest users, and wasters, of water globally.
Early Conclusions and Direction
Several options exist for large-scale application. Multiple beds can be linked together using beds along the contour, with interconnecting lines down the slope. Automation is needed to create beds at scale. The most promising approach described is a simple rotating wheel attached to a tractor’s three-point linkage that digs a trench along the contour, lays plastic film, places low-cost flow channels (bored bamboo or sticks), covers them with a narrow plastic strip as a dirt shield, fills the trench with organic waste, then grades the surface. A second set of trenches down the slope can be lined with pipe (plastic or bamboo) and shaped with a small hump to divert flow into the contour trenches. Another possibility is ploughing bubble wrap into soil with a modified pipe layer. A major advantage, beyond irrigation, is the drainage component during flooding.
Trials: Site and Typical Bed Construction
Trials were carried out at Kookaburra Park Eco Village near Gin Gin, close to Bundaberg in Queensland, a region nominally classified as the dry subtropics. Traditional wicking beds had been built previously, typically single beds up to 20 metres long and 1.5 metres wide, which is convenient for vegetables and access. A 90 mm stormwater pipe is commonly used to distribute water along a bed. It is highly effective, but pipe cost (noted at around $4 per metre) becomes uneconomic at large scale, so alternatives were explored.
Alternative Flow Channels
Several alternatives to plastic pipe were trialled. Hollowed bamboo covered with PE film performed very well but is not readily available in Australia. Random sticks (prunings) about 0.5 m long, covered with PE film, provided an irregular but still effective flow path, although collecting and laying them is time consuming. Folded bubble wrap (allowing flow between bubbles) had lower flow rates but was better suited to automation. Sticks laid onto bubble wrap with the wrap folded over the sticks gave very efficient water transport and required only a few sticks. Open fills such as wood chips were also tried alone or in combination.
Linking Beds Together at Orchard Scale
A core goal was to link many beds so multiple beds could be irrigated simultaneously at an economic scale. The concept used was an area around half a hectare per system, such as linked beds 50 m wide over 100 m long. An existing orchard was used, containing mature citrus (grapefruit, orange, lemon) and younger mango, lychee, and other subtropical fruits. Ideally, beds sit along contour lines, but the existing trees were not perfectly on contour and bed lengths varied, reflecting the real-world constraints likely in practice. The approach began by digging contour channels with minimal slope (similar to furrow irrigation but essentially level) and connecting them using slope channels down the incline. A simple earth hump (plug) was used to partially block the slope channel below each junction so water would hit the hump, fill the contour channel, then overflow the hump and continue down the slope to the next contour. During a period when work paused due to surgery, the system operated as contour furrows and performed well largely because the heavy black clay was impermeable; in more porous soils, infiltration losses would be much higher. A flow rate of 20 litres per minute was used to fill channels in the clay. After recovery, channels were converted to wicking beds by lining them with plastic film. Practical constraints meant channels were not perfectly shaped and a “perfect fit” film approach proved impractical. A workable method was adopted: cutting film wider than required, placing the flow material, partially filling with organic matter, filling with water, then “crunching” excess film down to level by foot. This is crude but effective under constraints. Slope channels were converted to pipe using 50 mm corrugated pipe, with inlet and outlet arranged to match the wicking bed plastic level and seal against film near the earth hump.
Findings: Hydraulics, Flooding, and Flow Rates
The original plan was to test hydraulics and then monitor plant growth and productivity. However, the trials moved from the normal dry season into heavy rains, with frequent storms over 200 mm in a day. This revealed that the linked wicking beds provided excellent drainage after floods. While 200 mm in a day creates sheet flooding that no system can instantly remove, many plants can tolerate short immersion if water drains away quickly. Long immersion kills most plants, so post-flood drainage can be the difference between survival and loss. High-flow stick systems transported water at far higher rates than the initial 20 L/min, allowing contour channels to fill and then divert full flow to the slope overflow pipe. Bamboo performed even better but is scarce locally. Bubble wrap and wood chip channels had greater resistance and could not handle 20 L/min; water overflowed to slope pipes before contour channels filled, and the small head feeding the 50 mm pipe was inadequate, causing overflow. Reducing inlet flow to 5 L/min solved overflow and allowed low-flow channels to fill properly. One channel filled with wood chips without a PE liner failed at low flow because leakage was too high; the basic flood irrigation principle of “get water on fast before it soaks away” is incompatible with unlined channels at low flow. A channel using bubble wrap (folded as a flow path) backfilled with virgin soil worked well and is attractive because it can be automated using a modified pipe layer, although it does not directly leverage organic material to improve soil and embed carbon; other methods may apply organics separately. Traditional open furrows proved problematic for weed control machinery, so they were converted to organic-filled wicking beds.
Open and Closed Wicking Beds
Wicking beds can be closed or open. In a closed system, plants grow in the bed and have easy water access, but the system suits shallow-rooted plants such as vegetables. In an open system, deeper rooted plants grow beside the wicking bed; water wicks upward and then moves sideways and down to the root zone. These trials mainly used open wicking beds. One bed used a combination approach: a wider bed (about 1.5 m) growing vegetables with fruit trees growing just outside; this improved land use and proved successful. Most other beds were narrower (about 0.5 m) and used purely for irrigating trees. A cover crop was also grown in and around beds for weed control, which is critical in hot dry subtropical climates where periodic heavy rains encourage weeds and insects. Aggressive cover crops (creeping grasses or legumes) outcompete weeds and improve soil quality. The report also notes another benefit: while surface tension in wicking action is relatively weak and depends on pore size and soil chemistry, plants generate much stronger forces through transpiration. As water evaporates from leaves, it pulls water upward through capillary chains; these forces are strong enough to lift water many metres. At night the driving energy stops and water can flow back down through easier paths, creating a diurnal cycle that can move meaningful quantities of water over distance and between plants.
Which System Appears Best?
Several practical options emerge. The simplest is to line a channel and fill it with waste organic material. This reduces flow, limiting bed length and requiring more slope lines. The most cost-effective system, where cheap labour and abundant prunings or bamboo exist, is a liner with bamboo or sticks covered with film, giving excellent flow characteristics. Bubble wrap systems are the easiest to automate over large areas.
Adapting to Climate Change: Two Scenarios
In an ideal world, wicking beds could absorb emissions through international trading, with developing countries absorbing carbon and selling offsets to developed nations. This is technically and socially attractive: it helps solve emissions and improves balance between rich and poor. However, there is a second scenario: no international agreement, leaving growers to adapt to climate change, particularly an intensified flood-and-drought cycle. The Gin Gin region already experiences erratic rainfall and high evaporation, with long dry stretches and small showers that evaporate without penetrating soil. Useful rain often arrives as “freak rain,” commonly the tail end of cyclones producing around 200 mm in a day over a few days, followed by blue skies and high evaporation. Growers adapt using swales on contour lines to slow and capture water; trees are often planted on ridges to avoid waterlogging in heavy soils so plants keep some roots dry and recover after floods. Farmers are opportunistic, growing when conditions are good and leaving land fallow in drought. Dams, leaky dams, swales, spillways, and deep-rooted grasses are used to store water, slow runoff, recharge water tables, and reduce erosion. These approaches can manage a normal flood–drought cycle reasonably well.
An Exceptional Year and New Problems
The year of the trials was not normal. A severe drought had lasted around ten years, among the longest on record. Local dam systems that cope with several-year droughts were inadequate for drought of that length. Drought usually breaks with a major storm and short flooding that fills dams. But the pattern experienced was different: a long drought followed by a series of severe storms, with heavy rain even between storms. This meant ground stayed continuously saturated for long periods. In some locations, where drainage was inadequate, plants died from continuous immersion. There is little you can do to protect against 200 mm per day sheet flooding, but what matters is how quickly water drains away afterwards. The wicking bed areas drained in about ten hours, while other areas remained flooded for days. Excessive rains were disastrous: some of the best crops in years were ruined after farmers had already paid costs for seed, fuel, and fertiliser. Wet ground made machinery access difficult, weeds exploded, and high humidity created major problems with rusts, fungi, and rots. Vegetables bolted rapidly and became unusable. These are the kinds of new problems growers may face as climate change intensifies. Wicking beds were developed to grow crops with limited water, but the accidental discovery of strong drainage capability may prove equally important for adapting to the flood-and-drought cycle.
Conclusions
Climate change and increased flood-and-drought cycles present a severe threat to future food production. Wicking beds have the potential to mitigate climate change by embedding large volumes of carbon into soil, but doing this at scale depends on international agreement and the ability to provide independent scientific evidence to negotiators. If there is no effective international accord on atmospheric carbon, agriculture will still have to adapt to harsher cycles. Wicking beds use less water, can store water for short periods, and now appear to offer meaningful drainage capability, providing a way to adapt to adverse conditions. The report suggests that previous limitations of large-scale installation cost can be overcome. A twin research approach is required: scientific data on carbon absorbed and continued refinement of low-cost, large-scale application technology. If these objectives are met, the system may contribute to what has been described as the greatest moral challenge of our age.
Download ‘Safeguarding Future Food Supply with Wicking Bed Technology’ (full PDF)
